|
 MADISON - After the outrageous decision by the right wing majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court to lift “Safer at Home,” we noted that there still is another case before the Court on this same issue. And guess what? The lead plaintiff is a major GOP donor, and he maxxed out to Justice Rebecca Bradley, as we explain here:
Conservative Justice Got $20K Contribution from Individual in Second Stay-at-Home Suit
We were also so disgusted by Chief Justice Roggensack’s “regular people” comment about the meatpackers in Green Bay that we checked out her statement of economic interest to see “regular” she was. Here’s what we found:
Roggensack Has at Least $295K+ in Investments
By the way, if you want to see financial relationships and how wealthy some of our other state elected officials are, just click here:
Statements of Economic Interests
Our Data Analyst, David Julseth, just posted statements of economic interests filed with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission as of May 2020. These statements cover calendar year 2019. This is the only place that the public can view them without first submitting a request form to do so!
 I hope you find these postings useful.
And I’d love to hear from you, so please email me at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
if you’d like.
Best,
Matt Rothschild
Executive Director
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
****
P.S. If you like the work we’re doing, please make a tax-deductible gift today to the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. We’d really appreciate it. Just click here. Thanks! |
Supreme Court ruling is going to cost lives in Green Bay, says State Representative. Troy Streckenbach's quick action to place a temporary Safer at Home order here helps combat the reckless and irresponsible decision by four conservative justices.
Wednesday's decision comes as no surprise, says Green Bay Senator. Justices put the bidding of their corporate benefactors over workers' lives.
State Representative from Green Bay area says Wednesday's Supreme Court decision on 'Safer at Home' only adds to confusion.
“In times like these, the people of Wisconsin need clear and concise leadership. Today’s disappointing court decision not only adds uncertainty but also goes against decades of legislative authority granted to Wisconsin’s Chief Health Official. Public health decisions should be made by public health experts and not by politicians. Previous legislatures approved laws for these moments recognizing it is necessary for the governor to be able protect the health of Wisconsin.”
Don’t be coaxed into a false sense of security by the Supreme Court’s misguided action, says Senate Democratic Leader.
“In times of confusion and fear, the people of Wisconsin need clear and consistent leadership. The court's decision today only adds to that uncertainty. The Executive Branch is the appropriate place for authority during a pandemic, when decisions about health and the economic well-being of the state are paramount. At a time when leadership is needed most, Wisconsin families are left with political games. Please don’t be coaxed into a false sense of security by the Supreme Court’s misguided action. Wisconsinites are resilient and when we work together to stay safer-at-home we can slow the spread and protect our most vulnerable loved ones.”